View Full Version: PAFF Mistakes

Military Nuts > Coffeeshop > PAFF Mistakes


Title: PAFF Mistakes


Grunt - May 13, 2010 04:49 AM (GMT)
I'm of the view that Mindef PAFF is making more mistakes these days and it deserves a thread to highlight their mistakes so that they can take appropriate action.

QUOTE
Joint Declaration of the ASEAN Defence Ministers on Strengthening Asean Defence Cooperation for Stability and Development of the Region

WE, the Defence Ministers of the Kingdom of Cambodia, the Republic of Indonesia, the Lao People's Democratic Republic, Malaysia, the Republic of Singapore, the Kingdom of Thailand, the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam and the Deputy Minister at the Prime Minister's Office of Brunei Darussalam, the Deputy Defence Minister of the Union of Myanmar and the Undersecretary for Finance and Armed Forces Modernisation Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines, gathered here in Ha Noi, Viet Nam on 11 May 2010 for the Fourth ASEAN Defence Ministers' Meeting (hereinafter referred to as "ADMM");

RECALLING the inauguration of ADMM, on 9 May 2006, as one of the historic milestones in the development of ASEAN, which plays a crucial role in contributing towards building the ASEAN Political - Security Community by 2015;

RECALLING also the signing of the Cha-Am Hua Hin Declaration on the Roadmap for an ASEAN Community 2009-2015, to adopt ASEAN Political - Security Community Blueprint;

REITERATING that the ADMM is the highest ministerial defence and security consultative and cooperative mechanism for the discussion of regional security issues with a view to ensuring that the ASEAN Member States live in peace with one another and with the world at large in a just, democratic and harmonious environment;

NOTING WITH SATISFACTION that significant progress has been made over the past four years since the inauguration of ADMM, in building confidence, consolidating solidarity, strengthening regional resilience and enhancing the status of ASEAN on the international arena;

EXPRESSING satisfaction with the results of the Seventh ASEAN Chiefs of Defence Forces Informal Meeting (ACDFIM), which was held on 25 March 2010 in Ha Noi with the theme of enhancing effectiveness of ASEAN military cooperation in dealing with non-traditional security challenges in the region; and commending the progress made by the ASEAN militaries in enhancing practical cooperation;

RECOGNISING Southeast Asia as a region of stability and vibrant development while facing a set of common global security challenges, especially those of a non-traditional nature, where collective efforts are needed to meet those challenges;

AFFIRMING the determination by ASEAN defence sectoral to cooperate and collaborate among ASEAN Member States as well as between ASEAN and its partners outside the region in response to emerging non-traditional security challenges;

REAFFIRMING the importance of establishing the ASEAN Defence Ministers Meeting-Plus (hereinafter referred to as "ADMM-Plus") as a robust, effective, open and inclusive component of the regional security architecture that would enable the ADMM to cooperate with the non-ASEAN countries to build capacity and better prepare ASEAN to address the complex security challenges;

UPHOLDING the principle of ASEAN centrality, where ASEAN shall be the driving force in the ADMM's interaction and cooperation with the non-ASEAN countries in the ADMM-Plus; as well as ASEAN's principles of non-interference and respect for national sovereignty;

RECALLING the positive outcomes of the ADMM Retreat in Bangkok on 3 November 2009 where the ASEAN Defence Ministers had reached a broad consensus on the configuration and composition of the ADMM-Plus;

REAFFIRMING the direction of the 16th ASEAN Summit held in Ha Noi, Viet Nam on 9 April 2010, for the ADMM to ensure the early implementation of the ADMM-Plus;

DO HEREBY DECLARE TO:

   1. Adopt the Paper on ADMM-Plus: Configuration and Composition which puts forth the most appropriate configuration and composition of the ADMM-Plus;


   2. Adopt the Paper on ADMM-Plus: Modalities and Procedures which sets out the modalities and procedures for operationalising the ADMM-Plus;


   3. Uphold the decision of the 16th ASEAN Summit that the ADMM-Plus would be inaugurated with an ADMM+8 configuration and a composition of the ten ASEAN Member States and the eight Dialogue Partners of ASEAN, namely Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Russia and the United States;


   4. Welcome Viet Nam to host the inaugural ADMM-Plus in 2010;


   5. Welcome Indonesia in its follow-up efforts to develop the Roadmap for the Use of ASEAN Military Assets and Capacities in Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief, including the establishment of Joint Coordination Committee (JCC) for HADR Cooperation, pursuant to the Concept Paper on the Use of ASEAN Military Assets and Capacities in Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief, which was adopted by the Third ADMM in February 2009;


   6. Welcome Thailand in its follow-up efforts to explore and identify feasible approaches and mechanisms for enhancing the cooperation between ASEAN defence establishments and civil society organisations in the region, viewing this as another step towards the realisation of the Concept Paper on ASEAN Defence Establishments and Civil Society Organisations Cooperation on Non-Traditional Security, which was adopted at the Third ADMM in February 2009;


   7. Welcome the idea initiated by Malaysia on forging cooperation in defence industry among ASEAN Member States, and noted the "ASEAN Defence Industry Dialogue: the Way Forward" as an initial step in exploring defence industry cooperation among ASEAN Member States;


   8. Strengthen ASEAN defence cooperation through capacity building and mobilisation of resources for the preparedness in tackling natural disasters and other emergencies, which are increasingly complex, non-traditional and transnational in nature; and


   9. Welcome Indonesia's chairmanship of ASEAN and its hosting of the Fifth ADMM in the year 2011.


DONE in Ha Noi, Viet Nam on the Eleventh Day of May in the Year Two Thousand and Ten, in a single original copy in the English language.

For Brunei Darussalam:

DATO SERI PADUKA EUSSOFF AGAKI HAJI ISMAIL
Deputy Minister at the Prime Minister's Office
For the Kingdom of Cambodia:

GENERAL TEA BANH
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of National Defence
For the Republic of Indonesia:

PURNOMO YUSGIANTORO
Minister of Defence
For the Lao People's Democratic Republic:

LIEUTENANT GENERAL DOUANGCHAY PHICHIT
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of National Defence
For Malaysia:

DATO' SRI DR AHMAD ZAHID HAMIDI
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defence
For the Union of Myanmar:

U AYE MYINT
Deputy Minister of Defence
For the Republic of the Philippines:

ANTONIO L. ROMERO II
Undersecretary for Finance and Armed Forces Modernazation Affairs
For the Republic of Singapore:

TEO CHEE HEAN
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence
For the Kingdom of Thailand:

GENERAL PRAWIT WONGSUWON
Minister of Defence
For the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam:

GENERAL PHUNG QUANG THANH
Minister of National Defence


How can they make such basic mistakes in listing the various ministers wrongly. I did not know that Teo Chee Hean was Thai... That should be a big, BIG clue that it is WRONG! :angry:

bdique - May 13, 2010 04:58 AM (GMT)
its poor formatting, the names belong to the title on top, not below, but yeah, its poor formatting like this that causes red faces...

sigh, PAFF, pls up your game :blink:

weasel1962 - May 13, 2010 08:26 AM (GMT)
If one has been in a govt org, one would know press officers don't do web uploads. They just email the release to the IT dept for upload. Worse, a lot of orgs outsource IT function to India and China who are sometimes clueless....

Having said that, some govt entities do have SOP for officers to recheck the web release to make sure that's correctly displayed. Either no knowledge sharing in this case or takes XX days to raise IS request to amend.....then IT dept comes back to say need 5 working days to amend 1 line of html code.

Could be just bureaucratically slow.

stars - May 13, 2010 09:03 AM (GMT)
another mistake in today's 90 cents paper. the article is about this year's NDP at the padang and the mobile column

SM-1 file picture but the text description of L2A4s

diCam - May 13, 2010 09:18 AM (GMT)
You guys seem to like picking on the press for mistakes. It could have been a case of "honest mistake". :lol:

What's the take from our ex-journalist? Any comment? :rolleyes:

warspite - May 13, 2010 10:30 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (diCam @ May 13 2010, 05:18 PM)
You guys seem to like picking on the press for mistakes. It could have been a case of "honest mistake". :lol:

What's the take from our ex-journalist? Any comment? :rolleyes:

Maybe honest mistake, but still unacceptable, esp. since we have the AMX13/SM1s in service for more than 40 bloody years!!!
This is not like some new piece of equipment that the non-mil guys in SPH is not familiar with, so really is inexcusable...

stars - May 13, 2010 10:37 AM (GMT)
to inform, educate and entertain

bdique - May 13, 2010 11:37 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (warspite @ May 13 2010, 06:30 PM)
QUOTE (diCam @ May 13 2010, 05:18 PM)
You guys seem to like picking on the press for mistakes. It could have been a case of "honest mistake".  :lol:

What's the take from our ex-journalist? Any comment?  :rolleyes:

Maybe honest mistake, but still unacceptable, esp. since we have the AMX13/SM1s in service for more than 40 bloody years!!!
This is not like some new piece of equipment that the non-mil guys in SPH is not familiar with, so really is inexcusable...

i have to agree, it kind of reflects how much effort is being put in, I'm sure the 'honest mistake' excuse didn't work on our teachers when they caught all the careless mistakes in our exams rite? :P

ChineseJunk - May 14, 2010 09:12 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (diCam @ May 13 2010, 05:18 PM)
You guys seem to like picking on the press for mistakes. It could have been a case of "honest mistake". :lol:

What's the take from our ex-journalist? Any comment? :rolleyes:


Far better hearing it from a former PAFF SO.

A PAFF Staff Officer writes

The resignations continue. Two SOs left recently. More will do so soon.

Hopefully the new DD will help the ailing directorate get its act together.

In all my years following defence issues, I have never seen the place so run down.

This is from something I posted in November 2009.

"Dear David,
Just a quick email to tell you how much I have enjoyed reading your blog. Most, if not all, of your remarks about Public Affairs are spot-on.

I have one comment though.

I believe you must be aware that Public Affairs' "behaviour" as a whole is very much the result of one person's misguided "leadership" and mismanagement. Unfortunately, each time you mention Public Affairs in your posts, it does come across that everyone working in Public Affairs thinks and behaves like that misguided being.

Nothing can be further from the truth. Most Public Affairs officers are decent folks. Most do not have a choice but to do his bidding - they do not agree but they have no choice, largely because they have no other options but to carry on working at Public Affairs even if they have to drag themselves to work each day and face his nonsense. The few who have choices and options have demonstrated their disagreement by leaving.

I should know. I am one of the lucky few who were able to find another job before handing in my letter.

Perhaps in your subsequent posts, you should consider drawing a clearer distinction and direct the fire at that one being instead of pointing at the entire Public Affairs directorate. On behalf of my genial but hapless former colleagues and good friends I have left behind in Public Affairs, I thank you in advance.

Do keep on writing! "

xtemujin - May 14, 2010 12:52 PM (GMT)
Even the day for the Republic of Singapore Navy Open House 2010 was not corrected until I mentioned it here.


ChineseJunk - May 27, 2010 06:20 AM (GMT)
PAFF's hearts and minds strategy.


The Straits Times Forum
May 27, 2010
Shooting incident: Mindef should have told public

YESTERDAY'S report ('Another SAF soldier shot by Thai farmer too') made me feel greatly disappointed with the Ministry of Defence's public affairs division.

Mindef's failure to admit that not one, but two Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) soldiers were shot in Thailand, until a relative of the second injured soldier approached The Straits Times, has demonstrated the ministry's basic reluctance to tell the public the truth about military casualties.

The second case also was a matter of genuine public interest, especially since a full-time national serviceman was involved.

As citizen soldiers and taxpayers, we have a right to expect that Mindef will account for all military casualties - whether in training or actual operations -where there are no national security implications.

Matthias Chew


diCam - May 27, 2010 08:00 AM (GMT)
I've a question. Why is the Minister for Defence not looking into this issue?

ChineseJunk - May 27, 2010 09:47 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (diCam @ May 27 2010, 04:00 PM)
I've a question. Why is the Minister for Defence not looking into this issue?


Because DPM isn't aware how badly the directorate's morale and ops readiness has deteriorated?

There's PAFF gossip I've been told which I've not blogged about, which would stun/raise eyebrows if it ever saw the light of day.

As a Singaporean, and one of the few journalists who has dealt with ALL eight DPAs, I feel I've done what I can to raise the red flag.

If MINDEF feels they can live with this joke, then so be it.


xtemujin - May 27, 2010 12:02 PM (GMT)
Better raise a pirate flag nowadays as it gets more attention.

Viper52 - May 28, 2010 01:44 AM (GMT)
A mea culpa of sorts?

Still lots of questions unanswered.

QUOTE

http://www.straitstimes.com/STForum/Story/...ory_532360.html

WE REFER to Mr Matthias Chew's letter yesterday ('Shooting incident: Mindef should have told public').

The Singapore Armed Forces' (SAF) immediate priority following any incident is to attend to the needs of the affected servicemen and to keep their families informed.

In the case of the training incident in Thailand, the servicemen were given immediate medical attention and arrangements were made for their safe return to Singapore on the same day for further medical treatment.

The families of the servicemen were immediately notified and provided regular updates. Whatever information that is available is thus provided to the servicemen and their families as soon as possible.

The Ministry of Defence (Mindef) informs the public whenever there is a serious incident, or where the incident is likely to be of public interest.

Given the nature of this incident, Mindef should have issued a media statement when it occurred.

Colonel Darius Lim,
Director, Public Affairs,
Ministry of Defence (Mindef)


diCam - May 28, 2010 05:57 AM (GMT)
Now I'm wondering... what would had happened if the late Dr GKS is still with MINDEF. Would he tolerate such PR standard?

FIVE-TWO - May 28, 2010 11:57 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (diCam @ May 28 2010, 01:57 PM)
Now I'm wondering... what would had happened if the late Dr GKS is still with MINDEF. Would he tolerate such PR standard?

under GKS, probably people like the current Dir, PAFF will never make it to where he is now.

edwin3060 - May 28, 2010 12:37 PM (GMT)
This situation is pretty indefensible. While it is true that the first priority is to take care of the injured servicemen, there is no reason that we couldn't concurrently update Singaporeans about the status of their sons in training--unless there was a special request by the family, and that doesn't seem to be the case here.

xtemujin - May 28, 2010 12:41 PM (GMT)
I concur, most of us want to know why did the NSF who was also shot was not in the news.

Most importantly, will steps be taken to rectify this oversight for the future or will it just be another honest mistake.

QUOTE (edwin3060 @ May 28 2010, 08:37 PM)
This situation is pretty indefensible. While it is true that the first priority is to take care of the injured servicemen, there is no reason that we couldn't concurrently update Singaporeans about the status of their sons in training--unless there was a special request by the family, and that doesn't seem to be the case here.

FIVE-TWO - May 28, 2010 03:18 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (xtemujin @ May 28 2010, 08:41 PM)
I concur, most of us want to know why did the NSF who was also shot was not in the news.

Most importantly, will steps be taken to rectify this oversight for the future or will it just be another honest mistake.

QUOTE (edwin3060 @ May 28 2010, 08:37 PM)
This situation is pretty indefensible. While it is true that the first priority is to take care of the injured servicemen, there is no reason that we couldn't concurrently update Singaporeans about the status of their sons in training--unless there was a special request by the family, and that doesn't seem to be the case here.

it can't be an honest mistake, how often does servicemen get injured in such a fashion during training?

Grunt - September 2, 2010 11:03 AM (GMT)
A minor mistake in reporting Pacific Endeavour by CBPioneer.

QUOTE
SAF co-hosts multinational communications exercise
Posted: 30 Aug 2010, 1800 hours (Time is GMT +8 hours)

Report by Lee Keh Yi
Photos courtesy of USPACOM and JCISD

Singapore co-hosted a multinational communications interoperability exercise, codenamed Pacific Endeavour, together with the United States Pacific Command (USPACOM), from 16 to 27 Aug.

The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) had taken part in the annual exercise since 2005 but this was the first time it was held at the Multinational Operations and Exercises Centre in the Republic of Singapore Navy's Changi Command and Control Centre.

The aim of the exercise was to enhance interoperability between participating nations, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the international humanitarian community in order to enable greater collaboration on communication systems for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief.

Brigadier-General (BG) Lee Shiang Long, Head Joint Communications and Information Systems (JCIS) and advisor to the exercise organising committee, noted that other than establishing a communications interoperability platform through information-sharing, an important element of the exercise was the fostering of personal ties between the participants.

"One of the key elements in any operation is the people. During the exercise, I got to know BG Brett Williams (Director for Communications System, USPACOM), as well as my counterparts in many countries, including Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, New Zealand and Thailand. The relationships built here will be very useful for future operations," BG Lee said.

These sentiments were echoed by the exercise participants themselves. Sergeant Lizana Muir from the New Zealand Air Force said: "It has been a good experience learning about how different nations work."

The exercise highlight was a disaster scenario which simulated an earthquake in Manila, Philippines. Participants were grouped by experience into cells which looked into various areas of the communication response to the scenario, including spectrum management, current and future operations, networks and information assurance.

For Chief Warrant Officer 3 Arthur Deleon from the US Marines, the most important part was "developing the relationships so that we know who the points of contract are and are able to utilise them in a time of need."

This year's exercise saw more than 250 communications experts from the armed forces of 16 Asia-Pacific nations, NGOs, the international humanitarian community and private industry taking part in a series of training workshops, discussions and communication network tests.

Outside of the exercise, the participants enjoyed the hospitality that Singapore can offer. Staff Sergeant Aaron White of the US Marines said: "We had some great food this last weekend - your chilli crab was special! It has been great just trying the food here and seeing the sights."


The above Mindef article failed to mention that officers from the Philippines took part, when the scenario was an earthquake in Manila, Philippines. When cutting and pasting, staff at PAFF at least look out for missing info that could have protocol implications. How can we practice how to help Philippines, without participation from their military? A bit rude, right?

Below is the news release from PACOM.

QUOTE
Pacific Endeavor Aims to Improve Response Time during National Disasters

By Lieutenant Theresa Donnelly
Pacific Command Public Affairs

CHANGI NAVAL BASE, Singapore  - Saving lives using agreed upon communication procedures was the goal during Pacific Endeavor, a multi-nation humanitarian workshop hosted by U.S. Pacific Command and the Singapore Armed Forces at Changi Command and Control Center in Changi Village, Singapore Aug. 16-27.

Many non-governmental organizations may have limited resources and logistical challenges to overcome when responding to a disaster. This is why a rapid installation of a communication network to coordinate relief efforts is critical to saving lives.

The workshop brought together militaries from 16 Asia-Pacific nations and for the first time since the program’s inception, members of the humanitarian community and business leaders from private industry also took part.

Salvation Army Lt. Col. Dan Starrett spoke of the importance of non-governmental partnerships with the military.

“We are always looking for ways we can be better partners with the military. The tremendous resources the military has in moving equipment and supplies is of particular interest to us and helps us respond to the needs of people more quickly,” he said.

During the two-week event, participants tested several communication networks in a disaster scenario, which simulated an earthquake in metro Manila.

“We [Armed Forces of the Philippines] already did a similar test with Exercise Balikatan earlier this year, but communication infrastructure was just a small part. But now during Pacific Endeavor, we can get into the gritty details and exercise the nuts and bolts of the communications part,” said Philippines Navy Lt. Cmdr. Marcus Jason Bartolome, a senior communicator and one of five military representatives from the Philippines attending the workshop. 


Established in 2003 under PACOM’s Multinational Communications Interoperability Program (MCIP), the program mirrors similar humanitarian communication workshops taking place at European and Africa Command.

Attendees have found that by working together before a crisis, they can dramatically cut down on miscommunication and misunderstanding, which can have devastating effects during a natural disaster.

The program is structured so that each participating nation plays a key role in the decision making process of how the workshop is planned. A corporate board consisting of representatives from each nation’s military spends months leading up to the workshop designing objectives. 

After the objectives are agreed upon, they are then placed into the scenario and assessed so each year, they can examine the challenge and opportunities each nation faces when communicating during a natural disaster.

“This is the first year we have involved internet security awareness training, so we spent time developing an agreed-upon information assurance plan,” said U.S. Marine Staff Sgt. Aaron White.

“This extremely important during a humanitarian crisis because there might be private information that must be protected, such as medical information or someone’s social security number,” he explained.     

Many of the best practices harnessed during Pacific Endeavor are already being utilized when responding to natural disasters. One such training is the use of social networking tools to quickly share information among several government agencies and non-governmental organizations. 

“Using web 2.0 technology during the recent Haiti crisis, we were able to save lives by rapidly disseminating information between the non-governmental organizations and military communities,” said John Holloway, liaison officer for PACOM and Sea Services. Holloway works for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense and tracks how the U.S. military shares information during a humanitarian crisis.

“This was a groundbreaking innovation in the way the U.S. military shares information among humanitarian agencies and the United Nations. Having this workshop compliments efforts already established and paves the way to further relationship building for increased coordination, which can ultimately saves lives in a natural disaster,” said Holloway. 

Shotgun - September 3, 2010 09:55 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Grunt @ Sep 2 2010, 07:03 PM)
A minor mistake in reporting Pacific Endeavour by CBPioneer.

QUOTE
SAF co-hosts multinational communications exercise
Posted: 30 Aug 2010, 1800 hours (Time is GMT +8 hours)

Report by Lee Keh Yi
Photos courtesy of USPACOM and JCISD

Singapore co-hosted a multinational communications interoperability exercise, codenamed Pacific Endeavour, together with the United States Pacific Command (USPACOM), from 16 to 27 Aug.

The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) had taken part in the annual exercise since 2005 but this was the first time it was held at the Multinational Operations and Exercises Centre in the Republic of Singapore Navy's Changi Command and Control Centre.

The aim of the exercise was to enhance interoperability between participating nations, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the international humanitarian community in order to enable greater collaboration on communication systems for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief.

Brigadier-General (BG) Lee Shiang Long, Head Joint Communications and Information Systems (JCIS) and advisor to the exercise organising committee, noted that other than establishing a communications interoperability platform through information-sharing, an important element of the exercise was the fostering of personal ties between the participants.

"One of the key elements in any operation is the people. During the exercise, I got to know BG Brett Williams (Director for Communications System, USPACOM), as well as my counterparts in many countries, including Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, New Zealand and Thailand. The relationships built here will be very useful for future operations," BG Lee said.

These sentiments were echoed by the exercise participants themselves. Sergeant Lizana Muir from the New Zealand Air Force said: "It has been a good experience learning about how different nations work."

The exercise highlight was a disaster scenario which simulated an earthquake in Manila, Philippines. Participants were grouped by experience into cells which looked into various areas of the communication response to the scenario, including spectrum management, current and future operations, networks and information assurance.

For Chief Warrant Officer 3 Arthur Deleon from the US Marines, the most important part was "developing the relationships so that we know who the points of contract are and are able to utilise them in a time of need."

This year's exercise saw more than 250 communications experts from the armed forces of 16 Asia-Pacific nations, NGOs, the international humanitarian community and private industry taking part in a series of training workshops, discussions and communication network tests.

Outside of the exercise, the participants enjoyed the hospitality that Singapore can offer. Staff Sergeant Aaron White of the US Marines said: "We had some great food this last weekend - your chilli crab was special! It has been great just trying the food here and seeing the sights."


The above Mindef article failed to mention that officers from the Philippines took part, when the scenario was an earthquake in Manila, Philippines. When cutting and pasting, staff at PAFF at least look out for missing info that could have protocol implications. How can we practice how to help Philippines, without participation from their military? A bit rude, right?

Below is the news release from PACOM.

QUOTE
Pacific Endeavor Aims to Improve Response Time during National Disasters

By Lieutenant Theresa Donnelly
Pacific Command Public Affairs

CHANGI NAVAL BASE, Singapore  - Saving lives using agreed upon communication procedures was the goal during Pacific Endeavor, a multi-nation humanitarian workshop hosted by U.S. Pacific Command and the Singapore Armed Forces at Changi Command and Control Center in Changi Village, Singapore Aug. 16-27.

Many non-governmental organizations may have limited resources and logistical challenges to overcome when responding to a disaster. This is why a rapid installation of a communication network to coordinate relief efforts is critical to saving lives.

The workshop brought together militaries from 16 Asia-Pacific nations and for the first time since the program’s inception, members of the humanitarian community and business leaders from private industry also took part.

Salvation Army Lt. Col. Dan Starrett spoke of the importance of non-governmental partnerships with the military.

“We are always looking for ways we can be better partners with the military. The tremendous resources the military has in moving equipment and supplies is of particular interest to us and helps us respond to the needs of people more quickly,” he said.

During the two-week event, participants tested several communication networks in a disaster scenario, which simulated an earthquake in metro Manila.

“We [Armed Forces of the Philippines] already did a similar test with Exercise Balikatan earlier this year, but communication infrastructure was just a small part. But now during Pacific Endeavor, we can get into the gritty details and exercise the nuts and bolts of the communications part,” said Philippines Navy Lt. Cmdr. Marcus Jason Bartolome, a senior communicator and one of five military representatives from the Philippines attending the workshop. 


Established in 2003 under PACOM’s Multinational Communications Interoperability Program (MCIP), the program mirrors similar humanitarian communication workshops taking place at European and Africa Command.

Attendees have found that by working together before a crisis, they can dramatically cut down on miscommunication and misunderstanding, which can have devastating effects during a natural disaster.

The program is structured so that each participating nation plays a key role in the decision making process of how the workshop is planned. A corporate board consisting of representatives from each nation’s military spends months leading up to the workshop designing objectives. 

After the objectives are agreed upon, they are then placed into the scenario and assessed so each year, they can examine the challenge and opportunities each nation faces when communicating during a natural disaster.

“This is the first year we have involved internet security awareness training, so we spent time developing an agreed-upon information assurance plan,” said U.S. Marine Staff Sgt. Aaron White.

“This extremely important during a humanitarian crisis because there might be private information that must be protected, such as medical information or someone’s social security number,” he explained.     

Many of the best practices harnessed during Pacific Endeavor are already being utilized when responding to natural disasters. One such training is the use of social networking tools to quickly share information among several government agencies and non-governmental organizations. 

“Using web 2.0 technology during the recent Haiti crisis, we were able to save lives by rapidly disseminating information between the non-governmental organizations and military communities,” said John Holloway, liaison officer for PACOM and Sea Services. Holloway works for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense and tracks how the U.S. military shares information during a humanitarian crisis.

“This was a groundbreaking innovation in the way the U.S. military shares information among humanitarian agencies and the United Nations. Having this workshop compliments efforts already established and paves the way to further relationship building for increased coordination, which can ultimately saves lives in a natural disaster,” said Holloway. 

Hmmm, in this case it seems that it was BG Lee who did not mention Philippines. Looks like a minor miss-out that could have been edited.

Grunt - September 3, 2010 03:33 PM (GMT)
The way they did it makes BG Lee look bad. And the role of PAFF, as media professionals, is to make the SAF look good. Now if the PAFF make a BG look bad, they are not doing a good job lah!

And this is not even external reporting. It's their own release. This is their staff work level... sigh... I'm really not expecting them to change.

Shotgun - September 3, 2010 04:00 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Grunt @ Sep 3 2010, 11:33 PM)
The way they did it makes BG Lee look bad. And the role of PAFF, as media professionals, is to make the SAF look good. Now if the PAFF make a BG look bad, they are not doing a good job lah!

And this is not even external reporting. It's their own release. This is their staff work level... sigh... I'm really not expecting them to change.

Well it depends what kinda angle you're looking at it from. To some, its kind of implicit that the Philippines Armed Forces would have played a part though I'm in agreement that the host-nation needs to have more than an honorable mention.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree